What happened
Los Angeles County civil court judges launched a pilot programme last month, integrating "Learned Hand" AI software to distil legal motions and draft tentative rulings. The tool, already used by Michigan's Supreme Court since summer 2025, assists half a dozen judges by summarising hundreds of pages and adapting to a jurist's writing style. Learned Hand's "Deep Verify" process fact-checks generated orders against case law citations. The pilot, costing over $300,000, extends into early 2027.
Why it matters
Court systems facing workload crises gain a mechanism to reduce case backlogs and administrative burden. Procurement teams evaluating legal tech must weigh efficiency gains against risks of predisposed judicial decision-making and public trust erosion. While judges are required to review and edit AI-generated drafts, no rule currently mandates disclosure of AI use, creating a transparency constraint. Previous incidents involved attorneys submitting hallucinated legal citations. Verification mechanisms are critical.
