What happened
A US judge expressed reservations regarding the forced divestiture of Google's ad business, specifically its Google Ad Manager, which includes ad server and ad exchange units. This follows a ruling identifying Google's illegal monopoly in ad technology. The US government advocates for this breakup, citing Google's market control over banner ads. Google contends that such a divestiture would introduce data security risks for publishers and advertisers. The judge has recommended mediation to resolve the dispute over Google's online advertising revenue.
Why it matters
The judge's reservations regarding the forced divestiture of Google's ad technology business, including Google Ad Manager, maintain the current integrated operational model. This sustains the existing dependency on Google's unified ad platform for publishers and advertisers, potentially increasing the oversight burden for procurement and compliance teams in managing vendor lock-in and ensuring fair market practices. It also maintains the current data security posture, which Google argues is more robust under its integrated control, placing the burden of validating this claim on IT security and risk management.
Related Articles

PubMatic Sues Google for Monopoly
Read more about PubMatic Sues Google for Monopoly →
Google Offers EU Ad Remedies
Read more about Google Offers EU Ad Remedies →
Google's Ad Tech Antitrust Fight
Read more about Google's Ad Tech Antitrust Fight →
Google Faces €2.95B EU Fine
Read more about Google Faces €2.95B EU Fine →
