AisurveillanceLiveAppeal 8.01 min read

Flock Safety Faces City Backlash

1 March 2026By Pulse24 desk
← Back
Share →

What happened

Dozens of US cities, including Santa Cruz and Cambridge, terminated contracts with Flock Safety over concerns its data aids federal deportation efforts. Los Angeles, however, continues deploying the technology. Flock's cameras capture vehicle location and identifying details like make, model, and colour, enabling police to search a national database for movements and predictions. The company claims its technology helps solve "10% of reported crime in the U.S.". CEO Garrett Langley admitted prior pilot programs with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Homeland Security Investigations, later severing ties.

Why it matters

Data governance challenges mount for city councils, law enforcement agencies, and legal teams deploying AI-powered surveillance tools. While police cite crime-solving metrics, the technology's ability to track law-abiding citizens and potential data sharing with federal agencies, despite local sanctuary policies, creates legal and ethical constraints on data use. Procurement teams must scrutinise data retention, access policies, and third-party sharing agreements for all surveillance technology.

Source · latimes.comAI-processed content may differ from the original.
Published 1 March 2026