AI Regulation: Federal vs. State

AI Regulation: Federal vs. State

28 November 2025

What happened

The White House is considering an executive order to preempt state-level AI legislation, aiming to establish a national policy framework. This initiative would introduce an AI Litigation Task Force to challenge state laws deemed unconstitutional or conflicting with federal regulations. Additionally, the Commerce Secretary would evaluate state AI laws, with the potential to restrict funding for states whose AI laws are considered inconsistent with federal directives. This action seeks to replace the current fragmented regulatory environment, characterised by over a thousand state AI legislative proposals, with a uniform federal standard.

Why it matters

This proposed federal preemption introduces a significant operational constraint for state legislative bodies and legal departments, who face potential invalidation of their AI-related statutes. The burden of legal defence and policy alignment shifts to state governments, increasing their exposure to federal challenges and potential financial penalties if their AI laws are deemed inconsistent. This creates a policy mismatch and an oversight burden for state-level compliance, legal, and procurement teams responsible for AI governance.

AI generated content may differ from the original.

Published on 28 November 2025
airegulationfederalismpolicytechnologyairegulationfederalpreemptionstatelawscompliance
  • AI: Inequality's New Frontier?

    AI: Inequality's New Frontier?

    Read more about AI: Inequality's New Frontier?
  • AI Regulation Order Paused

    AI Regulation Order Paused

    Read more about AI Regulation Order Paused
  • EU's AI Regulation Stumbles

    EU's AI Regulation Stumbles

    Read more about EU's AI Regulation Stumbles
  • EU AI regulation rethink

    EU AI regulation rethink

    Read more about EU AI regulation rethink